[Developers] optimising the size of checkpoints

[Erik Schnetter]

On Wednesday 15 June 2005 04:42, Thomas Radke wrote:
> Erik Schnetter wrote:
> > Since the tags are tables, it would need to be checkpoint=0 or
> > checkpoint="no" (with quotes).  I would prefer the former, which
> > would make it CCTK_INT, the same as boolean parameters.
>
> Sounds good to me. Would it also make sense to code in the integer
> how many timelevels should be checkpointed ?

I thought about this as well, and I think it does not make sense.  All 
active timelevels need to be checkpointed.  That information is only 
available at run time.

-erik

-- 
Erik Schnetter <schnetter at aei.mpg.de>   http://www.aei.mpg.de/~eschnett/

My email is as private as my paper mail.  I therefore support encrypting
and signing email messages.  Get my PGP key from www.keyserver.net.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.cactuscode.org/pipermail/developers/attachments/20050615/56b44f4d/attachment-0002.bin