[Developers] Re: [CactusMaint] IDAxiBrillBH no longer compiles on Absoft F90

Tom Goodale goodale at cct.lsu.edu
Thu Jun 2 06:25:38 CDT 2005



On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Erik Schnetter wrote:

> On Thursday 02 June 2005 12:48, Tom Goodale wrote:
>> On Tue, 31 May 2005, Erik Schnetter wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 31 May 2005 18:52, Jonathan Thornburg wrote:
>>>> I was indeed the one who introduced this.  I had _thought_ that
>>>> it was ok to omit the field width, and the Intel fortran compiler
>>>> seemed to grok that ok.  But a quick check in Metcalf & Reid's
>>>> Fortran 90 book doesn't mention that feature, so I just committed
>>>> a fix to say "I8" in all such places.  Hopefully that should make
>>>> the code strictly-legal and ok on all compilers...
>>>
>>> The code is okay, the compilers are not.
>>
>> Are you sure ? Looking at the F90 standard, it seems the number is
>> necessary.
>
> Let me back off a bit...  maybe Fortran 95?

Oops, I was looking at F95;  but it says that any standards conforming F90 
code will compile with F95, so F95 is certainly not stricter in this 
regard than F90.

Tom



More information about the Developers mailing list